| ACIS theory | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
91celicagtr Taking Off (2500RPM)
Posts : 80 Points : 105 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2009-10-13
| Subject: ACIS theory Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:57 pm | |
| Was just reading the ACIS threads and the powerdeck thread. what the powerdeck basically is is a spacer that sits underneath the flaps. In theory, this should be rubbish at lower rpm. Reason being that at low RPM, you want less intake volume and more intake volume at high RPM. If you put the spacer underneath the flaps on the air chamber, you are creating more intake volume so low-mid range RPM would be poor. Wouldnt it be more effective to slice the air chamber in half and weld in a spacer above the flaps? This way, low-mid range will not be effective and will have better high end performance Am i right or am i waffling on | |
|
| |
3Spower Moving Up The Rev Band (3500RPM)
Posts : 194 Points : 259 Reputation : 5 Join date : 2009-10-13
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:44 am | |
| In theory yes but IIRC, you have to think of the 'helmholtz' theory. In other words, there is an ideal amount of volume and i think standard was just about fine.
Don't forget you will have to adjust the fuel mixture top end aswell. | |
|
| |
Celica_XR9145 Admin
Posts : 481 Points : 788 Reputation : 2 Join date : 2009-07-14 Location : Dunedin, New Zealand
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:17 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
91celicagtr Taking Off (2500RPM)
Posts : 80 Points : 105 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2009-10-13
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:00 pm | |
| - 3Spower wrote:
- In theory yes but IIRC, you have to think of the 'helmholtz' theory. In other words, there is an ideal amount of volume and i think standard was just about fine.
Don't forget you will have to adjust the fuel mixture top end aswell. yes but there is always improvement to be made, at the end of the day its if the results are worth the effort. for the fuel mixture, an apexi AFC fuel controller could work. | |
|
| |
91celicagtr Taking Off (2500RPM)
Posts : 80 Points : 105 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2009-10-13
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:02 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Rusty Idling (750RPM)
Posts : 40 Points : 42 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-10-25 Age : 36 Location : New Zealand
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:06 am | |
| Just making sure... at 5400rpm, the butterflies open up rather than close.
and the powerdeck spacers sets above the butterflies
the intake manifold is already quite big (I think it was ~1,5L then opens up just under -2.0L) | |
|
| |
rollaboy Taking Off (2500RPM)
Posts : 97 Points : 123 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-10-26
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:20 pm | |
| - Rusty wrote:
- Just making sure... at 5400rpm, the butterflies open up rather than close.
and the powerdeck spacers sets above the butterflies
the intake manifold is already quite big (I think it was ~1,5L then opens up just under -2.0L) was just looking at this thread and the gen 2 and gen 3 are different. The gen 2 butterflies are on the removable chamber and the gen 3 butterflies are on the actual manifold. Thats why the powerdeck is probably only for the gen 3 3sge | |
|
| |
Rusty Idling (750RPM)
Posts : 40 Points : 42 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-10-25 Age : 36 Location : New Zealand
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:52 am | |
| ahh thanks for clearing that up | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: ACIS theory | |
| |
|
| |
| ACIS theory | |
|